Suite101

Gun Ownership by Convicted Felons

Exceptions to the Federal Prohibitions

© David J. Shestokas

Oct 4, 2008
Hand Gun, Svend Damsgaard
Federal law provides significant penalties for felons in possession of weapons, unless the felon has his rights restored by the convicting state.

Anyone who has been convicted of a felony is banned by federal law from ever possessing “any firearm or ammunition." Specifically a person "convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year" cannot possess any firearm in any location. 18 U.S.C. 922(g) is the federal law that prohibits anyone ever convicted of any felony to ever possess any firearm either inside or outside of his home. The federal punishment for felon gun possession is up to 10 years in prison.

There are many other federal gun ownership restrictions. For example, a conviction for a misdemeanor domestic battery results in a loss of gun rights. A person who is the subject of an order of protection may not possess a weapon. In light of the 2008 case of District of Colombia v. Heller, such restrictions may now have Second Amendment implications. A good summary is available from the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

The Statutory Exception

The rule prohibiting felon gun ownership has some exceptions. There is specific statutory language providing that the federal criminal firearms possession does not apply to individuals who have had their civil rights restored by the state in which they where convicted of the felony.

18 U.S.C. 921(a)(20) provides:

"Any conviction which has been expunged, or set aside or for which a person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored shall not be considered a conviction for purposes of this chapter, unless such pardon, expungement, or restoration of civil rights expressly [or implicitly as a matter of state law] provides that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms."

State Law Restoration of Rights

State law determines the restoration of civil rights for a state conviction, not federal law. The civil rights restoration must incorporate the right to serve on a jury, the right to seek and hold public office, and the right to vote. Absent restoration of these rights federal recognition of the state restoration of rights exception will not apply.

Federal law contains another passage to be considered. If the restoring state includes the three rights above, then one must determine if state law in any way restricts the convicted felon’s rights to possess a weapon. If there is any state restriction on the felon’s right to have a weapon then the possession of any firearms by the convicted felon is federally illegal. This is true even if all other civil rights are restored.

In the end, federal restrictions on the possession of firearms by convicted felons are entirely dependent upon the restrictions imposed by the various states. If there is a state restriction on an individual’s gun possession as the result of a criminal conviction, then possession is a violation of federal law.

The Process for Restoring Rights

Every state has its own process for felons to petition the government to restore their civil rights. Rights can be affected by the expunging or sealing of records which are judicial actions or pardons from the governor, which are executive actions. The level of restoration may be affected by the crime itself, whether it is a violent crime a drug crime or a crime of dishonesty. State laws vary greatly. For an example of the process, see Illinois Criminal Expungement Law.


The copyright of the article Gun Ownership by Convicted Felons in Law, Crime & Justice is owned by David J. Shestokas. Permission to republish Gun Ownership by Convicted Felons in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Hand Gun, Svend Damsgaard
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Nov 13, 2008 9:47 AM
Guest :
i have been looking for this information for so long and it was in the easiest place to find it. I personally asked a lawyer in California how should i go about restoring my constitutional rights and he was of absolutely no use. I am sure that gun-rights are not important to some lawyers or people personally but i believe that everyone should be concerned about the rights guarranteed in our constitution. If i adhere to the Law then i should have every privlege. Thank you
Mar 11, 2009 12:26 PM
Guest :
im doing something for school and this helps a lot
May 31, 2009 2:49 PM
Guest :
I have a felony conviction in federal court, and I am planning to sue for my rights to be restored after my period of supervision. I am aware that BATFE does not process the applications due to funding, but the law does allow one to petition the local district court if the petition is denied. I plan to claim a violation of my rights to due process, since I am not being allowed to take advantage of a remedy which still exists in the law. One main point will be that BATFE can always charge an application fee, as INS does for visa applications, thereby nullifying the congressional funding issue all together. I have not seen this arguement tried in any case.
3 Comments