Defaming the Innocent

Slander and Libel

Aug 4, 2009 Christopher Pascale

Misuse of the terms slander and libel on television, radio, and print can lead many to believe that the words have multiple meanings.

Defamation is a false statement of fact against an individual’s character or reputation, either intentionally or negligently published to a third person, holding the defamed person up to ridicule, contempt, hatred, shame, or disgrace. Defamation has serious repercussions, both personally and professionally for the intended victim. Additionally, the defamed person’s loved ones are victims as well.

There are two types of defamation:

  1. Slander
  2. Libel.

Slander is an untrue spoken statement about a person that harms their reputation and standing in their community. A person injured by slander can bring a civil lawsuit against the party that made the false statement.

Where a person is defamed in writing, it is called libel. Libel also includes television broadcasts. In many ways libel is more serious because it is more likely to reach a far greater audience. In New York a libeled person’s damages are presumed because the defamatory statement is preserved for a greater period of time.

Different States Have Different Statutes of Limitations

It is important to note that the statute of limitations for defamation is different in each state. A statute of limitations is the time that a civil or criminal action must be brought forward.

The limitations period begins when a defamatory statement is communicated to someone other than the plaintiff. For instance, in New York, New Jersey, and California the statute of limitations is one year. However, in Washington and Indiana it is two years.

Because of the varying limits from state to state it is imperative that a person who believes they have been defamed speak with an attorney immediately to protect his interests. It is also important to note that the laws regarding defamation in each state are subject to change by acts of their legislatures and appellate courts.

Although a person accused of slander can be brought to court, it must be proven that their statements were truly defamatory unless it is presumed where the statements:

  • Attack a person's professional character and standing
  • Allege that a person is infected with a sexually transmitted disease (STD)
  • Allege that a person has committed a crime

Slander That Can Damage a Person's Profession

It is hard for some to believe, but people make defamatory comments to intentionally hurt another person’s professional credibility every day. One example is rumors spread by an independent gas station owner that a nearby Native American reservation is able to sell its gasoline so cheaply because they put water in their tanks. From this statement it can be inferred that every dollar lost is revenue that the slanderer intended to gain.

On another note, spreading rumors that a co-worker is a compulsive liar is defamation as it is a statement that can only be made with malintent since the only possible result of such a statement being believed would be damaging to the victim's reputation.

False Statements About a Person's Sexual Past or Health

Statistics show that STDs, including the lethal Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), the precursor to the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), are rapidly on the rise among 15-24-year-olds. Since people afflicted with HIV and AIDS are unjustifiably prone to discrimination and social stigma due to perceptions of the disease, falsely stating that a person is HIV positive, or has another STD, is defamatory.

In fact, courts in New York have even found that it is medical malpractice for a doctor to negligently misdiagnose patients as HIV positive when they are not.

When it comes to a marriage contract, a scandal regarding one or both parties can result in a broken arrangement. If two families arranged for their children to be married but the arrangement was broken due to false statements that one party was impure or sick, the damaged party could sue.

Contrary to this, if a person's statements about someone's health resulted in a broken marriage contract, but the statement(s) were true, then there would be no grounds to collect damages as truth is an absolute defense.

Thus, making such true statements does not make one a slanderer. They make him (depending on the company he keeps) a great friend, or a real jerk.

False Statements About Someone Committing a Crime

If someone makes false statements about a person committing a crime, and they are arrested, it is understood that the victim has incurred damages. Even where they are not arrested, the victim has cause of action for defamation because in all likelihood they have, or will, suffer public ridicule and scorn.

By way of example, nothing good could ever come from someone being called a child molester or rapist. In fact, there are few things more damaging, if any. If the person who has been said to be a monster of this proportion can prove that the statements are in fact untrue, then he or she will be entitled to damages.

Slander is not to be taken lightly. It has serious repercussions for the defamed person both personally and professionally. Those who are victims of slander or libel have a personal responsibility to themselves and their loved ones to take measures to preserve and protect their reputations, because once it is stained it is difficult to fix.

This article was written with the guidance of Brian C. Pascale, Esq., an attorney in Mineola, New York, specializing in Plaintiff’s Personal Injury, Labor Law, and Medical Malpractice actions. He can be contacted by phone at 516-741-6800, or email at bcpascale@gmail.com.

* None of the statements contained in this article are to be construed or considered to be legal advice and is solely for informational purposes.

Sources

"Slander". nolo.com.

Bennett, Sherrie. "Slander and Libel". Lawyers.com.

"Defamation, Libel, and Slander Law". expertlaw.com.

"Sexually Transmitted Disease". epigee.org.

“Statute of Limitations”. Citemedialaw.com

“New Jersey Statute of Limitations”. The-injury-lawyer-directory.com

The copyright of the article Defaming the Innocent in Law, Crime & Justice is owned by Christopher Pascale. Permission to republish Defaming the Innocent in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
Defaming Someone to a Buddy List is Libel, Anon
Defaming Someone to a Buddy List is Libel
Slander is Not Gossip.  It is a Crime, Israel Papillon
Slander is Not Gossip. It is a Crime
The Humiliation of Slander is Very Isolating, Sanja Gjenero
The Humiliation of Slander is Very Isolating
Family Members are Collateral Damage of Defamation, Anon
Family Members are Collateral Damage of Defamation
   
What do you think about this article?

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
post your comment
What is 8+7?

Comments

Aug 4, 2009 9:13 AM
Guest :
Why has no journalist or writer considered writing about the Groucho Club and the 'pre publishing test case for libel' they are taking against a writer of a book about the club. The book is titled 'The Groucho Gate Affair'. This is the worst libel case in UK history and an attack on free speech. What’s funny is that the case is about what could be written and not about what has been written. I read a press release about it yesterday and yet no UK newspaper will run the story. There is no mention of it even when you do a Google news search. You must all be intimidated by the big bad Groucho Club. If you are all supporters of free speech and are appalled by the libel laws then why is no one supporting this writer? You must know, (that is all writers and journalists out there) that the only way to defeat a threat to free speech is to stand up and be counted whenever and wherever there is an attack on free speech. A libel action cannot be taken against everyone who supports the same issue no matter how much influence is exerted over the media. As far as I am concerned the current hypocrisy by the mainstream media is clearly a sign that the fight for ‘Free Speech –V- UK Libel Laws’ is over. We have lost.
I love to debate and talk about issues I care deeply about, but henceforth I am just going to be a quite girl and never ever say a word about anyone ever ever again or never ever speak my mind again. I surrender
Leanne
Aug 5, 2009 8:28 PM
Christopher Pascale :
Hi Leanne,

Here in the US, I had not heard about it.

Hopefully, this article will spark some interest in the subject and the matter of defamation. Perhaps you should write your local paper a letter. When it's published, it will probably publish online. That, matched with your comment here, will leave a trace of two on the web, and maybe get the ball rolling.
2 Comments